Rainbow Dash says if you think rape jokes are funny than you’re really damn gross. And who would want to disappoint RD.
Art (c) me, do not repost, steal, edit, ect.
May put out on a T-shirt/other.
But wait, what’s this?
(highly NSFW, linked):
Rape jokes bad, shota rape porn "grEAT".
Every fucking time.
Not only is your link of my nsfw drawing not shota, but it’s a drawing. You’re getting very unnecessary defensive over the fact my drawing is based on stopping rape JOKES, which can be from “haha you should be raped/ u just got raped!!” to real comedians making jokes about raping females in the audience. This has nothing to do with fictional non-con that is not harmful; and is appropriately placed on a NSFW blog with proper tags.
So, once again, you’ve failed in attempt to defend rape jokes. Also, I’ve never actually said non-con art is GREAT, so?????
Fantasizing about rape and making images of it is OK
Making jokes about about rape is not OK
SJW hypocrisy and hipster feminist hypocrisy at its finest!
"Rape jokes are disgusting and gross and if you laugh at them you are an evil piece of shit, now if you excuse me, I need to finger myself of a drawing I made of a little boy being violently gang raped, beaten until he bleeds and is bruised and is being humiliated by his rapists because they raped him so violently he’s lost control of his bladder because thats HOT and totally doesn’t make me a hypocrite."
FICTIONAL CHARACTER =/= REAL PERSON THERE’S A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOME FUCKER LAUGHING AND SAYING, “HAHAHAH SHUT UP YOU STUPID WHORE AND GO GET RAPED OR SOMETHING” STRAIGHT TO SOMEONE’S FACE AND SOMEONE DRAWING NON-CON/ENJOYING FICTIONAL SCENARIO’S IN WHICH A FICTIONAL CHARACTER IS SUBJECTED TO NONCONSENSUAL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE? BECAUSE I DON’T THINK YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE, I’LL EXPLAIN IT FOR YOU. RAPE JOKES DEMINISH THE SEVERITY OF RAPE, THEY MAKE RAPE SEEM LESS BAD, THEY TURN IT INTO SOMETHING TO BE LAUGHED AT. THERE’S NOTHING FUNNY ABOUT RAPE, NOTHING. NONCON PORN DOESN’T DEPICT REALISTIC SITUATIONS MOST OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME IT DEPICTS THAT THE VICTIM IS SOMEHOW ENJOYING WHAT IS BEING DONE TO THEM, WHICH IS ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY NOT HOW RAPE WORKS. I’VE HEARD CHILDREN SAY SHIT LIKE, “I’LL TOTALLY RAPE YOU!” (what they meant was i’ll totally beat you) AND THAT’S NOT FUCKING OKAY, I DON’T SEE CHILDREN DRAWING NONCON PORN. SO YEAH. CHEW ON THAT YOU ENABLING PIECE OF SHIT. YOU KNOW HOW PEOPLE SAY TWO WRONGS DON’T MAKE A RIGHT? TWO FUCKED FUCKED UP ACTIONS DON’T CANCEL EACHOTHER’s FUCKED-UP-NESS OUT.
AND NO, I’M NOT SAYING THAT NONCON IS A GOOD THING THAT SHOULD BE ENFORCED OR DEFENDED BUT I AM SAYING THAT FUCK YOU FOR TRYING TO USE THE FACT THAT THIS ARTIST HAPPENED TO DRAW NONCON TO CANCEL OUT ALL OF THEIR OTHER OPINIONS RAPE IS NOT FUCKING OKAY NO MATTER HOW YOU LOOK AT IT ARGUE WITH ME I FUCKING DARE YOU.
Sweetie, all the caps lock in the world won’t change what a complete and utter fucking hypocrite you are. Why are rape jokes evil and unforgivable but its okay for someone to draw as much porn as they want of little boys being violently gang-gang raped to the point you can barely see their faces from the amount of blood and tears they have on them? ”WAH WAH WAH RAPE JOKES HURT RAPE VICTIMS BUT DRAWING RAPE AS A HOT AND SEXY THING TO MASTURBATE TO DOESN’T!”
It’s just another case of “it’s only bad when YOU do it but I can do it as much as I want.” Get the fuck over yourself, you prissy little hypocrite.
Do you know what else? Do you know why rape porn and art was so popular in the Victorian era? Because the idea of women enjoying sex was considered so obscene, that in many cases the only acceptable way of drawing a woman in hanky-panky was when it was against her will: its why paintings such as Olympe and works such as Madame Bovary and Lady Chatterly’s Lover were considered obscene because Madame B and Lady C were perfectly unabashed in their enjoyment of adulterous sex. So your logic is “rape porn is only okay if its obvious the rape victim is clearly shown in anguish and pain”? Jesus christ the twisted logic you people engage in to justify your “do as I say not as I do” mentalities is fucking pathetic.
If you want to play that card, why is it okay that someone who has been raped or sexually assaulted should potentially come across some artwork which shows sexual trauma as nothing more for teenage fangirls to flick their beans too, but rape jokes must be banned forever?
Honest to god, the hypocrisy from you and your BFF is off the charts: have you considered being a politician? (just remember to turn off the caps lock first)
alright i’ll type in all lower case if it makes you feel better. patronizing me won’t make my point any less valid. you obviously didn’t read my whole post, because i stated that neither of the things displayed are alright, but the porn doesn’t make the jokes any less harmful, or vice versa. rape fetishization is just as harmful as rape jokes, i don’t think that either of these things are healthy or alright. i really wish that you would have read my original response instead of wasting my time making me spell it out for you. i don’t know the op, by the way, they are not my friend or my follower, and i don’t follow them. trying to use someone else’s harmful acts to justify your own is pathetic.
Lol, you don’t want to be patronised don’t post shit like this in all caps:
“ BECAUSE I DON’T THINK YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE, I’LL EXPLAIN IT FOR YOU. RAPE JOKES DEMINISH THE SEVERITY OF RAPE, THEY MAKE RAPE SEEM LESS BAD, THEY TURN IT INTO SOMETHING TO BE LAUGHED AT. THERE’S NOTHING FUNNY ABOUT RAPE, NOTHING. ”
I’m pretty sure drawing violent, bloody gang rape of children as nothing more then something for someone to furiously masturbate to diminishes the severity of rape by your logic, but of course its okay for your BFF to draw violent, bloody, pedophiliac gang-rape to her heart’s desire. Stop contradicting yourself: you have no point, you’re just another ”do as a I say not as I do type”. You’re too busy screeching about the eeeeevils of rape joke but you haven’t said a peep about your hypocrite BFF drawing gang rape of little boys whilst screeching about the evils of rape jokes. The only one enabling here, is you.
Drawing the violent rape of a character is YOUR prerogative, OP. No one can stop you (though some places may have laws about underage pornography, even of fictional characters). But to try and claim that jokes about rape are somehow worse or more trivialising than erotic artwork depicting brutal, violent rape is FLAT. OUT. WRONG. I don’t CARE that it’s a fictional character. I don’t care that you draw rape, despite how distasteful I personally find it. Freedom of speech and all that. Go for it. Draw a million more pictures of Naruto losing control of his bowels as he’s beaten senseless during his rape. But don’t you DARE try and claim the moral high ground here or act smug and superior over someone who cracks a joke about rape.
If the gravity of rape is so sacred that no one can joke about it, then displaying it in an erotic, “sexy” manner meant to portray it as something to be enjoyed by a non-participant (the person viewing the artwork) is a FAR greater sin. And this is coming from someone who was raped by three young men when she was 14.
I know I’m late, but this was so fucking pathetic that I can barely believe it really happened. This reads like Onion/Mad Magazine level satire. This puts any other “SJW” hypocrisy I’ve seen to shame.
poppypicklesticks was right, OP has a bright future in politics. If you can sell those kind of wolf tickets with a straight face, gutting food stamps in the name of “fiscal responsibility” while doubling the Pentagon’s budget should be a walk in the park.
Ooh, nice comparison to rape in in the Victorian era. History lessons are much appreciated and, well, Twilight-endorsed. Okay, I didn’t even need to say that, but I adore little miss book horse.
Lemme just point out that OP’s shota gangrape smut is more violent and twisted than anything I’ve ever seen John Joseco draw. But hey, you guys, at least he had it tagged on a NSFW blog.
Gimme a break.
This is never going to end, is it? This attitude about rape fiction or comedy, and the propensity of turbo feminists and white knights to use it as a cheap soapbox to attract attention and feel morally superior over a blatant group of strawmen?
If people like Anita Sarkeesian or Rebecca Watson can make so much money and draw so much support with their delusional opinions about rape culture and male domination in the media, then too many people are letting this shit slide and thinking its all good and righteous. But its not. Its bullshit.
At the very least, it wastes people’s time with guilt tripping that could otherwise be spent enjoying themselves in their dumb little fandoms, and at worst, it demonizes (typically straight white college-age) guys and rapes them in the court somewhere down the line should they decide to get married and end up in a divorce.
Rape is a crime. No amount of rape jokes or rape erotica will change the fact that if you hold me down and jam something in my ass without my permission, I’m gonna want to take your ass to the cops—so they can jam something up yours.
Rape is genderneutral. Its equal opportunity for all ages, genders, and creeds. Making it strictly about women is selfish, misleading, and stinks of an agenda, and I’ll bet my horse money that the reason people like OP care about rape so much is because they were told, or convinced, that they must be the heroes for the oppressed women and little girls. If they are men, they must help out of a sense of guilt; if female, sisterhood. Who wouldn’t want that chance, that shot at boosting your self-worth? Especially if the alternative is to be lumped in with the criminals by default. Because if they can’t catch you on an actual crime, they’ll make everyone believe you will eventually.
Or they’ll just cry about hurt feelings and claim abuse, when all else fails. That works too.
I kinda like the third Sarkeesian video. That one didn’t feel like a poorly edited TvTropes article being read by a boring girl. That one actually taught me something.
The rest suck though. From ignoring everything good about Zelda and Peach to complaining about killing prostitutes in GTA4 (what the fuck does she want, to make whores unkillable while you mow down civilians next to them?).
The thing I hate the most about Sarkeesian is that, well, she kinda sucks. She takes away from legit feminists that actually like games and now she is seen as the Paragon of Feminism in games. Uggg, I just wish people would stop bringing her up everytime feminism is discussed.
Media is kinda male dominated, though. Sure, less so now than 50 years ago, but there is nothing wrong with saying “we could work a bit on this”. Just as long as you are not a fucking heterophobic misandric hypocrite like this SJW and her rape porn.